Shopping Cart
Ghost catalogs & invisible represses: why labels keep vinyl “on list” for years without saying anything
Titles officially “in catalog,” zero stock, no repress date: the paradox of vinyl in 2020–2025. Is transparency really that hard—or has silence become a business model?
The “Schrödinger catalog”: the album exists and doesn’t
In theory it’s available: it appears on the official price list, has an active code, sometimes even an updated price. In practice, it never shows up. Months pass—then years—and that title remains suspended. Not out of print, but not pressed either. It’s vinyl’s Schrödinger cat: alive on the PDF page, dead in the warehouse.
This limbo creates a domino effect: retailers can’t plan, customers keep waiting, the used market inflates, and frustration turns into distrust. All of it could be avoided with one extra line of copy: “no repress planned in the next 6/12 months.”
Why opacity pays (for those who use it)
- Suspended demand: keeping the illusion alive retains buyers inside the brand’s corral and slows migration to alternatives.
- Anchored pricing: an “available” official list—served or not—acts as a psychological anchor for higher secondary prices.
- Internal flexibility: promising nothing lets you reallocate pressing capacity at the last minute without reputational cost.
- Responsibility offloaded: blame the format, PVC, logistics—never the communication policy.
Exclusivity = respect (often) on clearance
Where there’s exclusivity or near-monopoly on certain repertoires, respect for customers tends to fade. No need to hurry, no need to explain: “you’ll take this when (and if) it comes, or you’ll take nothing.” Competition enforces transparency; the lack of it enforces compliance.
The outcome? Minimal info, inscrutable repress windows, and preorders used as free demand surveys. Buyers end up hostage to programmed uncertainty.
Market side effects
- Distorted used prices: poorly communicated scarcity becomes “chronic” perceived scarcity.
- Retail planning wrecked: random inventory, tied-up capital, lost customers.
- Collector burnout: indefinite waiting turns passion into resignation.
- Rumor premium: without official data, whispers win and “maybe next week” becomes a strategy.
The bare minimum of transparency (that would truly help)
- Title status: “In repress,” “No repress planned in the next 6 months,” “Archived – no new production planned.”
- Time window: a target quarter (Q1, Q2…) instead of fictional dates.
- Short rationale: “plant capacity,” “rights renewal,” “priority to new releases.”
- Update cadence: a monthly catalog refresh with a public changelog.
We’re not asking for trade secrets—just useful information for rational decisions. Low cost, huge ecosystem benefit.
Typical objections (and why they don’t quite hold)
“The supply chain is unpredictable.” — True, but offering a range beats silence.
“Rights can change last minute.” — Exactly: say so. Labels that explain legal constraints earn trust.
“Competitors will copy our plans.” — Share status and quarter, not exact date or run size: that’s transparency, not suicide.
What labels can do (now)
- Public status legend for every catalog reference.
- Quarterly roadmap by family (no sensitive detail, yes to minimum verifiable commitments).
- Decision log: if a title stays “on list” unpressed for 12 months, trigger a visible flag: “long stand-by.”
- Trade newsletter with a structured feed (CSV/JSON) on statuses and repress windows.
For collectors: how not to get trapped
- Be wary of “soon” without a date or quarter.
- Set a mental deadline: after 6–9 months of nothing, consider alternatives (editions, formats, adjacent titles).
- Separate desire from “investment”: badly communicated scarcity isn’t value—it’s noise.
Conclusion (sharp, but useful)
Keeping titles “on catalog” without pressing is like reserving a table that doesn’t exist. A mature industry isn’t afraid to say: “not this one, for now.” Transparency doesn’t kill demand—it qualifies it. And, surprise, it sells better when the record finally lands.
